How a travel idea becomes verifiable information.
Automation accelerates the work; editorial rules decide what may be published.
1. Selection and coverage
We seek geographic diversity, real usefulness and non-repetitive angles. The system gives priority to under-covered countries and checks existing content identities and titles to reduce duplication.
2. Research and sources
Research prioritises governments, tourism boards, transport operators, protected areas, UNESCO and cultural institutions. Publication requires several identifiable sources; links and access dates are retained.
A link is not automatically reliable. We consider authority, freshness, scope and possible contradictions.
3. Use of artificial intelligence
We use AI only to generate ideas and suggest possible initial angles. All published content is written, translated, verified and reviewed by our team; AI is neither presented as an author nor treated as a source.
We do not intentionally insert visitor personal data into editorial ideation tasks.
4. Quality and publication
A guide must complete its practical sections, takeaways, sources, six language versions and required images. Absolute safety claims are blocked, and prices, timetables, visas or alerts are not presented as permanent guarantees.
5. Translation and adaptation
ES, EN, FR, IT, DE and PT versions remain tied to the same source article. Adaptation aims for natural language and cultural context without adding unverified facts.
6. Images, licensing and attribution
Photographs come from authorised repositories and platforms. For every asset we retain the provider, identifier, creator, licence, original URL, attribution and acquisition data; identifiable scenes also require editorial review.
7. Updates and corrections
Travel information changes. We flag facts that should be checked with an official source and update content when material changes are found.
To request a correction, use the contact page and include the URL, disputed statement and an up-to-date reference where possible. Material corrections enter the editorial review process.